Association of hospital volume and operative approach with clinical and financial outcomes of elective esophagectomy in the United States

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0303586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303586. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs.

Methods: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Results: Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations.

Conclusion: In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Elective Surgical Procedures* / economics
  • Esophagectomy* / economics
  • Esophagectomy* / mortality
  • Female
  • Hospital Costs
  • Hospital Mortality*
  • Hospitals, High-Volume* / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, Low-Volume / economics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.