A leadless ventricular pacemaker providing atrioventricular synchronous pacing in the real-world setting: 12-Month results from the Micra AV post-approval registry

Heart Rhythm. 2024 Oct;21(10):1939-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

Abstract

Background: Advances in leadless pacemaker technology have enabled accelerometer-based atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing by sensing atrial mechanical contraction.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to report the performance of the Micra AV leadless pacemaker from the worldwide Micra AV post-approval registry (PAR) through 12 months.

Methods: The Micra AV PAR is a prospective, single-arm, observational registry designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of Micra AV in a real-world setting. For the present interim analysis, major complications and system revisions through 12 months were summarized and compared to a historical cohort of 2667 patients implanted with a transvenous dual-chamber pacing system.

Results: The device was successfully implanted in 796 of 801 patients (99.4%) at 97 centers in 19 countries. Micra AV patients were older (74.1 years vs 71.1 years; P < .0001) with a higher incidence of renal disease (22.3% vs 9.8%; P < .0001) compared with transvenous dual-chamber patients. Through 12 months, the major complication rate was 3.7% in Micra AV patients compared with 8.8% in transvenous dual-chamber patients (hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.61; P < .001). The system revision rate was 1.5% in Micra AV patients compared with 5.5% for transvenous dual-chamber patients (hazard ratio 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.47; P < .001); this reduction was largely driven by the absence of lead dislodgments requiring revision. The median AV synchrony index was 79.4% (interquartile range 65.2%-86.4%) in patients paced >90%.

Conclusion: The Micra AV leadless pacemaker was implanted with a high rate of success in patients with multiple comorbidities, with a significantly lower rate of complications and system revisions through 12 months compared to a historical cohort of patients with transvenous dual-chamber pacemakers.

Keywords: Atrioventricular block; Atrioventricular synchronous pacing; Bradycardia; Clinical trial; Leadless pacing.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial* / methods
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Registries*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome