Influence of midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens on fluid reservoir thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity

Purpose: To investigate whether the midday removal and re-application of scleral lenses (SL) influences fluid reservoir (FR) thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.

Methods: Two clinical experiments were conducted. A total of 49 keratoconic eyes were evaluated for Part1(tear film and visual acuity analysis) and 12 keratoconic eyes for Part2 (FR thickness analysis). All subjects were wearing 16.4 mm SL for more than 12-months. Tear Film Surface Quality (TFSQ) was evaluated with Medmont E300 at more than 120 min of SL wear, 10 min after SL removal (pre-corneal TFSQ) and 5 min after re-apply the same SL. High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity (HCVA and LCVA) were also assessed with the SL on eye (before and after re-application). For Part2, Anterior OCT (MOptim MOcean4000, China) measurements were taken with and without the SL (at the same time points of Part1) and three outcomes were evaluated: FR thickness, SL thickness (control measurement) and corneal thickness.

Results: Removing and re-applying a SL had a statistically significant positive impact on TFSQ, with an improvement from 0.26 ± 011 to 0.16 ± 0.08 (p = 0.001). This was accompanied by a statistically significant improvement in LogMAR HCVA (from 0.10 ± 0.09 to 0.08 ± 0.08, p < 0.001) and LCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.13 to 0.36 ± 0.13, p < 0.001). Regarding Part2 of the study, a statistically significant increase in FR thickness was observed after SL re-application (from 223.64 ± 48.08 µm to 267.81 ± 80.03 µm, p = 0.007). No changes in corneal thickness were observed.

Conclusions: Midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens positively impacted pre-lens tear film surface quality, although the observed improvement in visual acuity does not constitute a clinically significant change. Clinicians should consider that removing and reapplying a scleral lens may result in an overestimation of the fluid reservoir thickness, which could affect clinical assessments and treatment decisions.