Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification for adnexal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: A number of studies have reported that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging might be used for the early diagnosis of adnexal masses. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS combined with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification for adnexal masses.

Materials and methods: Related articles were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in strict accordance with established standards, and data (including true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values) was extracted from the original articles. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate the quality of articles and the possibility of bias. STATA 12.0 software was used to perform statistical analysis.

Results: Five articles that included 598 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS combined with O-RADS for the diagnosis of adnexal masses were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.98) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91). Moreover, the positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 6.81 (95% CI: 4.61-10.08), 0.05 (95% CI: 0.03-0.11), 111.30 (95% CI: 65.32-189.65), and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98), respectively. The pooled AUC and DOR for the detection of CEUS combined with O-RADS were superior to O-RADS US.

Conclusion: Our findings revealed that O-RADS combined with CEUS can improve the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian adnexal masses.