[Porphyromonas gingivalis persisters induce the immuno-inflammatory responses in macrophages by upregulating the forkhead box1 signaling pathway]

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 9;59(7):672-680. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20231114-00248.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) persisters (Ps) on immuno-inflammatory responses in macrophages, and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Methods: Pg cells were cultured to the stationary phase (72 h), and subsequently treated by high concentration of metronidazole at 100 mg/L, amoxicillin at 100 mg/L and the combination of them for different time period, named as metronidazole group, amoxicillin group and (metronidazole+amoxicillin) group. Pg cells without treatment were used as Blank control. The survival profile of PgPs cells was measured by colony-forming unit assay. The living state of PgPs was observed by Live/Dead staining. Then, Pg and metronidazole-treated PgPs (M-PgPs) were used to treat macrophages, named as Pg group and M-PgPs group. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe the bacteria in the macrophages. The expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages were determined by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The location of forkhead box transcription factor 1 (FOXO1) was detected by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. After inhibiting or enhancing the FOXO1 expressions using inhibitors (Fi) or activators (Fa) respectively, the macrophages were treated with Pg and M-PgPs, divided as Blank group, Pg group, M-PgPs group, Fi group, (Fi+Pg) group, (Fi+M-PgPs) group, Fa group, (Fa+Pg) group and (Fa+M-PgPs) group. Then, the expression pattens of proinflammatory cytokines were assessed. Results: Remarkable number of lived PgPs was observed, both in planktonic culture and Pg biofilms either treated with metronidazole, amoxicillin or both, and those persisters could form new colonies. Pg and M-PgPs were able to enter into the macrophages and the protein expression levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [Pg group: (2 392±188), (162±29), (5 558±661), (789±155) μg/L; M-PgPs group: (2 415±420), (155±3), (5 732±782), (821±176) μg/L] were significantly upregulated than those in Blank group [(485±140), (21±9), (2 332±87), (77±7) μg/L] (P<0.01). Moreover, Pg and M-PgPs could facilitate the nuclear translocation and accumulation of FOXO1. In addition, the relative mRNA expression levels of FOXO1, B-cell lymphoma 6 and Krüppel-like factor 2 were upregulated when compared to Blank group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α in Fi+Pg group [(1 081±168), (70±8), (1 976±544), (420±47) μg/L] were remarkably lower than Pg group [(4 411±137), (179±6), (5 161±929), (934±24) μg/L] (P<0.05). Similarly, the protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α in Fi+M-PgPs group [(1 032±237), (74±10), (1 861±614), (405±32) μg/L] were remarkably lower than M-PgPs group [(4 342±314), (164±17), (4 438±1 374), (957±25) μg/L] (P<0.05). On the contrary, the protein expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α in Fa+Pg group [(8 198±1 825), (431±28), (8 919±650), (2 186±301) μg/L] and Fa+M-PgPs group [(8 159±2 627), (475±26), (8 995±653), (2 255±387) μg/L] were significantly higher than Pg group and M-PgPs group, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusions: PgPs are highly tolerant to metronidazole and amoxicillin. The M-PgPs could enhance the immuno-inflammatory responses in macrophages by upregulating the FOXO1 signaling pathway, while this effect exhibits no significant difference with Pg.

目的: 探索牙龈卟啉单胞菌(Pg)持留菌(Ps)对巨噬细胞免疫炎症反应的影响及其作用机制。 方法: 将Pg(ATCC 33277)悬浮培养和生物膜培养至对数末期(72 h)后,不使用药物处理以及使用高浓度甲硝唑(100 mg/L)和(或)阿莫西林(100 mg/L)处理不同时间,分别为空白对照组、甲硝唑组、阿莫西林组、甲硝唑+阿莫西林组,采用血平板计数法检测Ps生成数量,细菌活死染色检测Ps的生存状态;使用Pg和甲硝唑处理的PgPs(M-PgPs)刺激巨噬细胞,分别为空白对照组(不经任何处理)、Pg组、M-PgPs组;通过透射电镜观察细菌进入细胞内部的情况;使用实时荧光定量PCR(RT-qPCR)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法检测巨噬细胞内炎症相关指标的表达情况;通过RT-qPCR检测巨噬细胞叉头盒转录因子1(FOXO1)信号通路的激活情况;利用共聚焦免疫荧光显微镜检测FOXO1在巨噬细胞内的分布情况。使用FOXO1抑制剂(Fi)和激活剂(Fa)处理巨噬细胞后,用Pg和M-PgPs刺激巨噬细胞,分别为空白对照组(不经任何处理)、Pg组、M-PgPs组、Fi组、Fi+Pg组、Fi+M-PgPs组、Fa组、Fa+Pg组和Fa+M-PgPs组,通过RT-qPCR和ELISA法检测巨噬细胞内炎症相关指标的表达情况。 结果: 悬浮培养和生物膜中的Pg经过高浓度的甲硝唑和(或)阿莫西林处理后,均无法被完全杀灭,且存活的Ps可重新生长形成菌落;Pg和M-PgPs均可进入巨噬细胞内部且巨噬细胞中的炎症因子白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、IL-8和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的蛋白表达量[Pg组分别为(2 392±188)、(162±29)、(5 558±661)、(789±155)μg/L;M-PgPs组分别为(2 415±420)、(155±3)、(5 732±782)、(821± 176)μg/L]均显著高于空白对照组[分别为(485±140)、(21±9)、(2 332±87)、(77±7)μg/L](均P<0.01)。同时,Pg和M-PgPs均可促进巨噬细胞内FOXO1入核,巨噬细胞内FOXO1信号通路相关基因FOXO1、B细胞淋巴瘤6和Krüppel样转录因子2 mRNA的相对表达量均显著高于空白对照组(均P<0.05)。另外,Fi+Pg组IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α的蛋白表达量[分别为(1 081±168)、(70±8)、(1 976±544)、(420±47)μg/L]均显著低于Pg组[分别为(4 411±137)、(179±6)、(5 161±929)、(934±24)μg/L](均P<0.05);Fi+M-PgPs组IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α的蛋白表达量[分别为(1 032±237)、(74±10)、(1 861±614)、(405±32)μg/L]均显著低于M-PgPs组[分别为(4 342±314)、(164±17)、(4 438±1 374)、(957±25)μg/L](均P<0.05)。相反,Fa+Pg组IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α蛋白表达量[分别为(8 198±1 825)、(431±28)、(8 919±650)、(2 186±301)μg/L]以及Fa+M-PgPs组蛋白表达量[分别为(8 159±2 627)、(475±26)、(8 995±653)、(2 255±387)μg/L]均显著高于Pg组和M-PgPs组(均P<0.05)。 结论: PgPs对甲硝唑和阿莫西林表现出高度耐药性;M-PgPs通过上调FOXO1信号通路诱发巨噬细胞的免疫炎症反应,该作用与未经药物处理的Pg无显著差异。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Amoxicillin / pharmacology
  • Animals
  • Biofilms* / drug effects
  • Forkhead Box Protein O1 / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Inflammation
  • Interleukin-1beta / metabolism
  • Interleukin-6 / metabolism
  • Interleukin-8 / metabolism
  • Macrophages* / metabolism
  • Metronidazole* / pharmacology
  • Mice
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis*
  • Signal Transduction*
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / metabolism
  • Up-Regulation

Substances

  • Metronidazole
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
  • Interleukin-6
  • Amoxicillin
  • Interleukin-1beta
  • Forkhead Box Protein O1
  • Interleukin-8