Diagnostic performance of multiplex lateral flow tests in ambulatory patients with acute respiratory illness

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Sep;110(1):116421. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116421. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

Abstract

We assessed the performance of three different multiplex lateral flow assays manufactured by SureScreen, Microprofit and Goldsite which provide results for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and SARS-CoV-2. Between 4 April and 20 October 2023, 1646 patients 6 months and older presenting to an outpatient department of a hospital in Hong Kong with ≥2 symptoms or signs of an acute respiratory illness were enrolled. The point estimates for all three multiplex tests had sensitivity >80% for influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 compared to PCR, and the tests manufactured by Microprofit and Goldsite had sensitivity >84% to detect RSV. Specificity was >97% for all three tests except for the SureScreen test which had specificity 86.2% (95% CI: 83.9% to 88.3%) for influenza A. Sensitivity was lower than reported by the manufacturers, resulting in a higher risk of false negatives. The three multiplex tests performed better in patients with high viral loads.

Keywords: COVID-19; Influenza; Lateral flow assay; RSV; Rapid antigen test; Sensitivity; Specificity.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Hong Kong
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods
  • Immunoassay / standards
  • Infant
  • Influenza A virus / isolation & purification
  • Influenza, Human* / diagnosis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections / diagnosis
  • Respiratory Tract Infections / diagnosis
  • Respiratory Tract Infections / virology
  • SARS-CoV-2*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity*
  • Young Adult