Global Trends in Orthopedic Biofilm Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1994-2022

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jul 3:17:3057-3069. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S465632. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objective: Bibliometric analysis is commonly used to visualize the knowledge foundation, trends, and patterns in a specific scientific field by performing a quantitative evaluation of the relevant literature. The purpose of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of recent studies in the field of orthopedic biofilm research and identify its current trends and hotspots.

Methods: Research studies were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases and analyzed in bibliometrix with R package (4.2.2).

Results: A total of 2426 literature were included in the study. Journal of orthopaedic research and Clinical orthopaedics and related research ranked first in terms of productivity and impact, with 57 published articles and 32 h-index, respectively. Trampuz A, Ohio State Univ and the United States ranked as the most productive authors, institutions, and countries. Biofilm formation, role of sonication, biomaterial mechanism and antibiotic loading have been investigated as the trend and hotspots in the field of orthopedic biofilm research.

Conclusion: This study provides a thorough overview of the state of the art of current orthopedic biofilm research and offers valuable insights into recent trends and hotspots in this field.

Keywords: bibliometric analysis; biofilm; hotspot; orthopedic infection; research trend.

Grants and funding

This work is funded by the Nursing Critical Care Key Technology Training Base Project (Grant No. SHDC22022223); the Nanshan District Health Science and Technology Project (Grant No. NS2023002; NS2023044); the Nanshan District Health Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. NSZD2023023; NSZD2023026); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82102640), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3602203), the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (Grant No. A2023195) and the Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (Grant No. JCYJ20230807115918039). The sponsors played no part in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing, or the decision to submit the article for publication.