Health-related quality of life with comprehensive geriatric assessment guided care versus usual care in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024 Sep:201:104442. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104442. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided care improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older adults with cancer compared to usual care.

Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through biomedical databases. Meta-analyses using DerSimonian-Laird model summarized the difference in the mean change of HRQL scores from baseline across various time points, with evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE tool. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations analyzed predictors of HRQL improvement.

Results: Potential improvement in the global HRQL score by CGA-guided care at 3 months (Cohen's d 0.27, 95 % CI -0.03-0.58, moderate certainty), could not be excluded. Larger RCTs or those mandating CGA before initiating anti-cancer treatment were predictors of improved HRQL.

Conclusion: The effects of CGA-guided care on HRQL were variable. Larger RCTs and those mandating pre-treatment CGA tended to report improved HRQL.

Keywords: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; Geriatric Oncology; Health-related quality of life; Randomized trials.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Geriatric Assessment* / methods
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Neoplasms* / psychology
  • Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Quality of Life*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*