Efficacy and Safety of Re-Challenging PD-1 Inhibitors in Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Previously Treated with Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitors

Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Jul 10:16:771-780. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S460716. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy.

Patients and methods: We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).

Results: A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1-28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3-14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8-7.2], P = 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, P = 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, P = 0.025).

Conclusion: mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.

Keywords: PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors; chemotherapy; metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma; second-line treatment strategies.

Grants and funding

This study is partly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Program Grants 82203755 and 62220106006), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Program Grants 2022A1515010673), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Program Grants 2021B1515120013) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (Program Grants 2022A0505050033).