Normothermic Perfusion is Superior to Cold Perfusion in Porcine Ex Situ Lung Perfusion

Background: Cold ex situ lung perfusion (ESLP) has demonstrated improved preservation in small animal ESLP compared to normothermic ESLP and cold static preservation. We hypothesized that cold negative pressure ventilation (NPV)-ESLP would improve graft function in a porcine transplantation model.

Methods: Four perfusate temperatures were examined with 12 hours NPV-ESLP in a large animal transplantation model. Pig lungs were allotted to four groups: (1) Normothermia (38°C, n = 6); (2) profound hypothermia (10°C, n = 6); (3) moderate hypothermia (20°C, n = 3); (4) subnormothermia (32°C, n = 3). A fifth group subnormothermic low-flow (SNLF) perfusion was examined to assess the effect of reduced cardiac output with cold perfusion (32°C, 10% cardiac output, n = 6).

Results: Only Normothermic and SNLF groups demonstrated acceptable oxygenation after 12 hours NPV-ESLP and were transplanted. All other groups failed prematurely. After 12 hours of ESLP, Normothermic lungs demonstrated significantly greater dynamic compliance compared to SNLF lungs (P = .03). Edema formation post-ESLP was significantly worse in the SNLF group (P = .01). There was no significant difference in pulmonary artery pressures after ESLP (P = .10); however, pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly greater in the SNLF (P = .04). Isolated left lung oxygenation 4-hours post-transplant and left lung edema formation was not significantly different between Normothermic and SNLF post-transplant (P = .09). Proinflammatory cytokines were significantly greater during SNLF-ESLP (tumor necrosis factor alpha, P < .05).

Conclusions: Prolonged normothermic (38°C) NPV-ESLP is superior to 10, 20, and 32°C perfusion. Normothermic ESLP of porcine lungs results in superior graft function and reduced inflammation versus SNLF-ESLP.