Exploratory rasch analysis of a static-99R clinical cohort assessment

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307216. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Modern test theory supplements the more prevalent classic methods for assessing test properties. However, such an assessment of the commonly used sexual recidivism risk assessment instrument, Static-99R, has yet to be attempted. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of said instrument using Rasch analysis. The clinical cohort assessed consisted of individuals with mental disorders convicted of a sexual offense (N = 146). Results showed that the original ten-item Static‑99R did not meet the Rasch model requirements, and revisions of the instrument with seven and nine items each only marginally improved performance. More reliable results could likely have been obtained with a larger, non-clinical sample and a more randomized distribution of missing data. Despite the consistently poor performance of item 3 ("Index non-sexual violence") in all three analyses, reliability was slightly improved by dichotomizing the only two polytomous items in the Static-99R; items 1 ("Age at release from index offense") and 5 ("Prior sexual offenses"). These results may be of interest considering the significant change of splitting the formerly dichotomous item 1 into four different response categories in the revision of Static-99 to Static-99R.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis
  • Mental Disorders / psychology
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychometrics* / methods
  • Recidivism / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Sex Offenses* / psychology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Board of Forensic Medicine (Rättsmedicinalverket) and the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) grants 432551 and 819681 under the ALF agreement. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.