Is Spirometry a Sufficient Test for Assessing Respiratory Function after Lung Resection?

Curr Oncol. 2024 Jul 11;31(7):3985-3993. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070295.

Abstract

Background: The prediction of postoperative functional status in non-small cell lung cancer patients based on preoperative assessment of physical and respiratory capacity is inadequate based on recent RCTs.

Material and methods: Prospectively collected spirometry data and the six-minute walk test results of 57 patients treated with lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. The tests were performed before surgery, and 30 and 90 days after lobectomy. All patients underwent a respiratory functional and physical capacity assessment.

Results: All 57 patients underwent lobectomy. Before surgery, mean FEV1 was 2.4 ± 0.7 L, corresponding to %FEV1 of 88.3 ± 17.3%. The mean absolute and expected 6MWT distance was 548 ± 74.6 m and 108.9 ± 14.5%, respectively. At the first postoperative evaluation 30 days after surgery, FEV1 and %FEV1 decreased significantly by an average of 0.5 ± 0.3 L and 15.1 ± 10.7%, while 6MWT and expected 6MWT decreased minimally by an average of 1.0 m and 0.8%, respectively. Three months after lobectomy, FEV1 and %FEV1, compared with the initial assessment, decreased by an average of 0.3 ± 0.3 l and 7.8 ± 10.0%, while 6MWT and its expected score increased to 564.6 ± 84.6 m and 112.8 ± 15.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: After lobectomy, FEV1 decreased slightly and less than expected, while 6MWT increased proportionally compared to the preoperative evaluation.

Keywords: lung cancer; rehabilitative and perioperative care; respiratory function.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / surgery
  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Volume
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pneumonectomy / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Respiratory Function Tests / methods
  • Spirometry* / methods

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.