Topical Chloramphenicol in Ophthalmology: Old is Gold

Purpose: Topical chloramphenicol is one of the most ubiquitous antibiotics used in ophthalmology and oculoplastic surgery globally. It shows broad-spectrum activity against a variety of different pathogenic organisms, is well tolerated on the ocular surface and displays excellent topical pharmacokinetics. Chloramphenicol has been available for purchase over the counter in the United Kingdom since 2005. Despite this, the largest health economy in the world, The United States has had a de-facto moratorium on its use for the past 30 years. In this review, we aim to evaluate topical chloramphenicol in ophthalmology and oculoplastic surgery and to determine whether its reputation within the US is warranted and justified.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review to evaluate the different facets of chloramphenicol, providing a detailed understanding of the drug, its historical context, the benefits and perceived risks, including safety concerns, and clinical perspectives of its use in clinical practice.

Results: The mechanism of chloramphenicol, the context around which the drug's use in the US declined, and the drug's evidence base and safety data, including published case reports of serious adverse events, were analysed. The perceived benefits of the drug, particularly in light of antimicrobial resistance and its economic impact, were reviewed. Finally, perspectives on its use in clinical practice in ophthalmology and associated allied specialities were presented.

Conclusion: Chloramphenicol and its topical application have been misunderstood for many decades, particularly in the United States. Its demise across the Atlantic was due to an overzealous response to a dubious association with a weak evidence base. Numerous authors have since validated the safety profile of the and its safety has been borne out. The benefits of chloramphenicol, an effective broad-spectrum agent with a positive cost differential in the era of anti-microbial resistance and fiscal tightening, cannot be understated. Its likely effectiveness as a therapeutic topical agent in ophthalmic surgery makes it a valuable tool in the ophthalmic anti-microbial armoury. We would encourage the reinstatement of this valuable yet misunderstood drug as a first-line agent for simple ophthalmic infections.