[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy in patients with driver gene and programmed death ligand-1 double negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 6;104(30):2797-2804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240528-01209.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the efficacy and safety of the dual immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are double negative for driver gene and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Methods: We conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data for 61 patients with advanced NSCLC who were negative for both driver genes and PD-L1 and received dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2019 to June 2023. Based on treatment conditions, patients were divided into first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy groups. Patients were followed up monthly, with the follow-up period ending on October 1, 2023. The efficacy was evaluated using Solid Tumor Response Evaluation Criteria, and adverse reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events developed by the National Cancer Institute in the United States. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy patients. The influence factors of PFS were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: Among the 61 NSCLC patients, 49 were male (80.3%), with an age range of 23-88 years [(65.3±7.4) years]. There were 14 cases (23.0%) classified as stage ⅢC and 47 cases (77.0%) classified as stage Ⅳ according to TNM staging. Forty cases (65.6%) received non-first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 24.6% (15/61), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52.5% (32/61). All 61 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up time of 17.8 months. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95%CI: 5.5-6.4 months), and the median OS was 17.0 months (95%CI: 14.8-19.2 months). For patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy, the median PFS was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [7.0 months (95%CI: 6.0-7.9 months) vs 4.0 months (95%CI: 3.3-4.6 months), P<0.001]; similarly, the median OS for patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [19.0 months (95%CI: 18.1-19.9 months) vs 13.0 months (95%CI: 10.8-15.1 months), P<0.001]. Multivariate Cox risk regression model analysis showed that distant tumor metastasis (HR=1.414, 95%CI: 1.253-1.725), non-first-line dual immunotherapy (HR=1.412, 95%CI: 1.184-1.652), and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb (HR=1.328, 95%CI: 1.151-1.546) were risk factors for PFS, while non-squamous carcinoma (HR=0.917, 95%CI: 0.823-0.984) was a protective factor for PFS. Immune-related adverse reactions occurred in 41 cases (67.2%), including 21 cases (32.8%) of grade 3-4 adverse reactions. Eight cases (13.1%) discontinued treatment, and there were no deaths. Conclusions: Dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab can be a treatment option for driver gene and PD-L1 double-negative advanced NSCLC. Distant tumor metastasis, non-first-line dual immunotherapy, and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb are risk factors affecting patients' PFS, while non-squamous cell carcinoma is a protective factor affecting patients' PFS.

目的: 探讨纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗双免疫治疗驱动基因和程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)双阴性晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的效果和安全性。 方法: 回顾性收集2019年1月至2023年6月就诊于广州医科大学第一附属医院接受纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗双免疫治疗的61例驱动基因和PD-L1双阴性NSCLC患者的临床资料。根据治疗情况,将患者分为一线和非一线双免疫治疗组。每月随访1次,随访截至2023年10月1日。应用实体瘤疗效评价标准评价疗效,不良反应评价参照美国国立癌症研究所制定的通用不良反应术语标准。以Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用log-rank检验比较一线和非一线双免疫治疗患者无进展生存时间(PFS)和总生存时间(OS)的差异。采用多因素Cox风险回归模型分析PFS的影响因素。 结果: 61例NSCLC患者中,男49例(80.3%);年龄23~88(65.3±7.4)岁;TNM分期为ⅢC期14例(23.0%),Ⅳ期47例(77.0%);非一线治疗40例(65.6%)。客观缓解率为24.6%(15/61),疾病控制率为52.5%(32/61)。61例患者均获得随访,中位随访时间为17.8个月,中位PFS为6.0个月(95%CI:5.5~6.4个月),中位OS为17.0个月(95%CI:14.8~19.2个月)。一线双免疫治疗患者的中位PFS长于非一线双免疫治疗患者[7.0个月(95%CI:6.0~7.9个月)比4.0个月(95%CI:3.3~4.6个月),P<0.001];一线双免疫治疗患者中位OS长于非一线双免疫治疗患者[19.0个月(95%CI:18.1~19.9个月)比13.0个月(95%CI:10.8~15.1个月),P<0.001]。多因素Cox风险回归模型分析结果显示,肿瘤远处转移(HR=1.414,95%CI:1.253~1.725)、非一线双免疫疗法(HR=1.412,95%CI:1.184~1.652)、肿瘤突变负荷<10 mut/Mb(HR=1.328,95%CI:1.151~1.546)是PFS的危险因素,非鳞癌(HR=0.917,95%CI:0.823~0.984)是PFS的保护因素。发生免疫治疗相关不良反应41例(67.2%),其中3~4级不良反应21例(32.8%),停药8例(13.1%),无死亡病例。 结论: 纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法可作为晚期驱动基因和PD-L1双阴性NSCLC患者的治疗选择。肿瘤远处转移、非一线双免疗法、肿瘤突变负荷<10 mut/Mb是影响患者PFS的危险因素,非鳞癌是影响患者PFS的保护因素。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use
  • B7-H1 Antigen / genetics
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / drug therapy
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / genetics
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy*
  • Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Lung Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Lung Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • CD274 protein, human