Automated segmentation in pelvic radiotherapy: A comprehensive evaluation of ATLAS-, machine learning-, and deep learning-based models

Phys Med. 2024 Sep:125:104486. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104486. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence can standardize and automatize highly demanding procedures, such as manual segmentation, especially in an anatomical site as common as the pelvis. This study investigated four automated segmentation tools on computed tomography (CT) images in female and male pelvic radiotherapy (RT) starting from simpler and well-known atlas-based methods to the most recent neural networks-based algorithms. The evaluation included quantitative, qualitative and time efficiency assessments. A mono-institutional consecutive series of 40 cervical cancer and 40 prostate cancer structure sets were retrospectively selected. After a preparatory phase, the remaining 20 testing sets per each site were auto-segmented by the atlas-based model STAPLE, a Random Forest-based model, and two Deep Learning-based tools (DL), MVision and LimbusAI. Setting manual segmentation as the Ground Truth, 200 structure sets were compared in terms of Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and Distance-to-Agreement Portion (DAP). Automated segmentation and manual correction durations were recorded. Expert clinicians performed a qualitative evaluation. In cervical cancer CTs, DL outperformed the other tools with higher quantitative metrics, qualitative scores, and shorter correction times. On the other hand, in prostate cancer CTs, the performance across all the analyzed tools was comparable in terms of both quantitative and qualitative metrics. Such discrepancy in performance outcome could be explained by the wide range of anatomical variability in cervical cancer with respect to the strict bladder and rectum filling preparation in prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Decreasing segmentation times can reduce the burden of pelvic radiation therapy routine in an automated workflow.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automated contouring; Deep learning; Machine learning.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Automation*
  • Deep Learning*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted* / methods
  • Machine Learning
  • Male
  • Pelvis* / diagnostic imaging
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / radiotherapy