Background: STRATAFIX, a recently introduced barbed suture device, incorporates self-anchoring, knotless sutures with higher tensile strength and enhanced tissue-holding capacity compared to traditional braided absorbable sutures. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of barbed sutures and interrupted sutures in capsular and fascial closure during total hip arthroplasty.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between April 2017 and March 2021. Overall, 547 patients were evaluated, comprising 77 men and 470 women (mean age: 64.5 years). Among them, 330 patients were in the interrupted suture (control) group, while 217 were in the barbed suture (BS) group. Data on surgical time, perioperative hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, complications such as transfusions and delayed wound healing, and dislocation rates were collected during the latest outpatient follow-up and compared between the two groups.
Results: No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss between the groups. However, the BS group exhibited significantly longer operative time, as well as significantly lower postoperative blood loss, total blood loss, and postoperative hemoglobin drop compared to the control group. Dislocation was reported in two cases within the control group, whereas no instances were recorded in the BS group.
Conclusion: The use of barbed sutures demonstrated effectiveness in reducing perioperative blood loss for capsular and fascial closure during total hip arthroplasty.
Keywords: Barbed sutures; Hip surgery; Postoperative complications; Surgical sutures; Total hip arthroplasty; Wound closure techniques.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.