Cost-utility analysis of primary HPV testing through home-based self-sampling in comparison to visual inspection using acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in East district, Sikkim, India, 2023

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 13;19(8):e0300556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300556. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Primary Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing offers higher sensitivity and specificity over Visual Inspection using Acetic acid (VIA) in cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling is a promising strategy to boost participation and reduce disparities. However, concerns about the initial costs hinder HPV testing adoption in low and middle-income countries. This study assesses the cost-utility of home-based HPV self-sampling versus VIA for cervical cancer screening in India.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in East district, Sikkim, India, comparing the costs and utility outcomes of population-based cervical cancer screening through VIA and primary HPV screening through self-sampling. Cost-related data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022 using the bottom-up micro-costing method, while utility measures were collected prospectively using the EuroQoL-5D-5L questionnaire. The utility values were converted into quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) for an 8-day period. The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was based on per capita GDP for 2022. If the calculated Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) value is lower than the WTP threshold, it signifies that the intervention is cost-effective.

Results: The study included 95 women in each group of cervical cancer screening with VIA & HPV self-sampling. For eight days, the QALD was found to be 7.977 for the VIA group and 8.0 for the HPV group. The unit cost per woman screened by VIA and HPV self-testing was ₹1,597 (US$ 19.2) and ₹1,271(US$ 15.3), respectively. The ICER was ₹-14,459 (US$ -173.6), which was much below the WTP threshold for eight QALDs, i.e. ₹ 4,193 (US$ 50.4).

Conclusion: The findings support HPV self-sampling as a cost-effective alternative to VIA. This informs policymakers and healthcare providers for better resource allocation in cervical cancer screening in Sikkim.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acetic Acid*
  • Adult
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Early Detection of Cancer* / economics
  • Early Detection of Cancer* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • India / epidemiology
  • Middle Aged
  • Papillomaviridae / isolation & purification
  • Papillomavirus Infections / diagnosis
  • Papillomavirus Infections / virology
  • Self Care / economics
  • Self-Testing
  • Specimen Handling / economics
  • Specimen Handling / methods
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / economics
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / epidemiology
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / virology

Substances

  • Acetic Acid

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.