While engagement in meaningful activities is associated with well-being, the influence of gender on this relationship is unknown. The study aims to (a) examine the difference between meaningful engagement and well-being for individuals who identify as men and women and (b) explore the association between engagement and well-being in men and women. In this observational study, 256 community-dwelling individuals completed meaningful engagement and well-being measures. Between-group t tests indicated no significant differences between men and women for engagement (t = 0.595, p = .552) and well-being (t = 0.818, p = .414). There were fair, positive correlations (rs = .376; p < .01) between engagement and well-being for men and moderate positive correlations (rs = .567; p < .01) between engagement and well-being for women. Self-identified gender may influence the relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and the sense of well-being it provides.
Keywords: occupational choice; occupational engagement; well-being; women.
Exploring Similarities and Differences in How Meaningful Activities Influence Well-being for Males and FemalesThe study examines the similarities and differences between meaningful engagement and well-being for males and females. Community-dwelling adults completed a demographic questionnaire, the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS), and the World Health Organization–5 Well-being Index (WHO-5). A total of 256 people participated. There were no differences in the extent of meaningful engagement or well-being between males and females. However, females demonstrated a stronger relationship between engaging in meaningful activities and increased well-being. This indicates that females are more likely to improve their well-being by engaging in activities they find meaningful than males. Cultural and personal stereotypes influence what is considered meaningful and can consequently impact how meaningful engagement connects to well-being. Gender stereotypes are influential on cultural and personal levels and could be influencing the meaning males and females experience during engagement in certain activities. Increasing our understanding of the meaning people experience during everyday tasks can help inform occupational therapy interventions and enhance well-being as an outcome of therapy. More research is needed to further establish the reliability of validity of the EMAS in varied populations. In addition, future research should expand participant options for gender identity rather than restricting it to two choices (male, female).