Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients Requiring Hemodialysis

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29237.

Abstract

Importance: Randomized clinical trials have shown that sacubitril-valsartan reduces the risks of mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis were excluded.

Objective: To investigate the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs or ARBs) in patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness study included patients who were 18 years or older with HFrEF, enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, and survived at least 90 days receiving in-center hemodialysis from July 8, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Patients were excluded for less than 180 days of continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D primary payer coverage or prior dispensing of sacubitril-valsartan. Data analysis was conducted from September 23, 2023, to June 25, 2024.

Exposures: New use of sacubitril-valsartan vs new or continued use of ACEIs or ARBs.

Main outcomes and measures: The associations between initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models in a propensity score-matched sample.

Results: Participants included 1:1 matched pairs of 1434 sacubitril-valsartan users and 1434 ACEI or ARB users (mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years). Of the 2868 matched participants, 996 (65%) were male; 987 (34%) were Black or African American and 1677 (58%) were White; and median dialysis vintage was 3.8 (IQR, 1.8-6.3) years. The median follow-up was 0.9 (IQR, 0.4-1.7) years. Sacubitril-valsartan (vs ACEI or ARB) therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]) and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]) or HF hospitalization (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]). There was a decrease in hyperkalemia (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62-0.81]) and no difference in hypotension (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83-1.19]). Only 195 participants (14%) ever received the maximum combination dose of sacubitril (97 mg twice daily) and valsartan (103 mg twice daily).

Conclusions and relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis, sacubitril-valsartan therapy was associated with beneficial effects in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aminobutyrates* / therapeutic use
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists* / therapeutic use
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Biphenyl Compounds* / therapeutic use
  • Drug Combinations*
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / drug therapy
  • Heart Failure* / mortality
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Propensity Score
  • Renal Dialysis*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume / drug effects
  • United States
  • Valsartan* / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Valsartan
  • Drug Combinations
  • Aminobutyrates
  • sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors