Optical frequency domain imaging-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: the OPINION ACS randomised trial

EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 2;20(17):e1086-e1097. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00314.

Abstract

Background: The clinical benefits of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear.

Aims: We sought to compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and OFDI-guided PCI in patients with ACS.

Methods: OPINION ACS is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial that compared OFDI-guided PCI with IVUS-guided PCI using current-generation drug-eluting stents in ACS patients (n=158). The primary endpoint was in-stent minimum lumen area (MLA), assessed using 8-month follow-up OFDI.

Results: Patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (55%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (29%), or unstable angina pectoris (16%). PCI procedural success was achieved in all patients, with comparably low periprocedural complications rates in both groups. Immediately after PCI, the minimum stent area (p=0.096) tended to be smaller for OFDI versus IVUS guidance. Proximal stent edge dissection (p=0.012) and irregular protrusion (p=0.03) were significantly less frequent in OFDI-guided procedures than in IVUS-guided procedures. Post-PCI coronary flow, assessed using corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame counts, was significantly better in the OFDI-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (p<0.001). The least squares mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) in-stent MLA at 8 months was 4.91 (95% CI: 4.53-5.30) mm2 and 4.76 (95% CI: 4.35-5.17) mm2 in the OFDI- and IVUS-guided groups, respectively, demonstrating the non-inferiority of OFDI guidance (pnon-inferiority<0.001). The average neointima area tended to be smaller in the OFDI-guided group. The frequency of major adverse cardiac events was similar.

Conclusions: Among ACS patients, OFDI-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI were equally safe and feasible, with comparable in-stent MLA at 8 months. OFDI guidance may be a potential option in ACS patients. This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jrct.niph.go.jp: jRCTs052190093).

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome* / diagnostic imaging
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome* / surgery
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome* / therapy
  • Aged
  • Angina, Unstable / diagnostic imaging
  • Angina, Unstable / surgery
  • Angina, Unstable / therapy
  • Drug-Eluting Stents*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / diagnostic imaging
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / surgery
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / therapy
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence / methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional* / methods