Exploring combination treatment options for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Sep 4:zxae252. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae252. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: This review explores the management of persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), emphasizing the importance of timely intervention due to SAB's association with metastatic dissemination, relapse, and mortality.

Summary: The literature analysis first delves into risk factors for persistent SAB, highlighting the need for effective treatment strategies. The subsequent focus is on combination strategies for persistent SAB. Daptomycin, ertapenem, ceftaroline, fosfomycin, rifampin, and gentamicin are explored as adjuncts to cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillins. Daptomycin combination therapy is assessed through in vivo and clinical studies, indicating potential benefits, especially with higher-risk sources of infection. Ertapenem combination therapy has been demonstrated to have a synergistic effect with cefazolin, presenting a viable salvage option. Rifampin's ability to penetrate biofilm is examined, with discussion of inconclusive evidence on mortality benefits. The review also considers stewardship implications, discussing concerns such as resistance emergence, adverse events, and increased costs associated with combination therapy. Mathematical models suggest combination therapy as an effective approach to prevent resistance. Adverse events vary with each combination, and duration of therapy remains diverse across studies in the absence of well-established dosing guidelines.

Conclusion: The review provides a thorough exploration of the literature on treatment of persistent SAB, underscoring the need for evidence-based guidelines, further studies, and clinical judgment in tailoring treatment strategies. The multifaceted analysis contributes valuable insights for clinicians managing this challenging condition.