Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy a network meta-analysis

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 5;409(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03452-3.

Abstract

Purpose: Choosing the best stump closure method for laparoscopic appendectomy has been a debated issue, especially for patients with acute appendicitis. The lack of consensus in the literature and the diverse techniques available have prompted the need for a comprehensive evaluation to guide surgeons in selecting the most optimal appendiceal stump closure method.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases from inception until December 2023 to find relevant studies according to eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of total complications.

Results: 25 studies with a total of 3308 patients were included in this study, overall complications did not reveal a significant advantage for any intervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53; 1.01), Superficial and deep infection risks were similar across all methods, Operative time was significantly longer with endoloop and Intracorporeal sutures (MD = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.28; 10.85) (MD = 26.1, 95% CI: 20.9; 31.29).

Conclusions: There are no significant differences in overall complications among closure methods. However, Intracorporeal sutures and endoloop techniques were associated with extended operative durations.

Keywords: Appendiceal stump; Appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Network meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Appendectomy* / adverse effects
  • Appendectomy* / methods
  • Appendicitis* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Suture Techniques
  • Treatment Outcome