Collaborative Implementation of Robotic Surgery Into an Academic Pediatric Surgery Practice

Introduction: Robotic surgery continues to drive evolution in minimally invasive surgery. Due to the confined operative fields encountered, pediatric surgeons may uniquely benefit from the precise control offered by robotic technologies compared to open and laparoscopic techniques. We describe a unique collaborative implementation of robotic surgery into an academic pediatric surgery practice through adult robotic surgeon partnership. We compare robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) outcomes, hypothesizing that RC will be equivalent to LC in key quality outcomes.

Methods: We evaluate 14 mo of systems development and training, and 24 mo of collaborative operative experience evoking a purposeful tiered case progression, establishing core robotic competencies, prior to advancing operative complexity. Univariate analyses compared LC versus RC.

Results: 36 robotic operations were performed in children aged 8-18 y, in a tiered progression from 24 cholecystectomies to 2 ileocecectomies, 2 paraesophageal hernia repairs, 1 anterior rectopexy, 1 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 1 Heller myotomy, 1 choledochal cyst resection with roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, 1 median arcuate ligament release, and 1 thoracic esophageal duplication cyst resection. For LC and RC, there were no significant differences in procedure duration, discharge opioids, hospital readmission, or rates of surgical site infection or bile duct injury.

Conclusions: Robotic surgery has potential to significantly enhance pediatric surgery. RC appears equivalent to LC but presents multiple additional theoretical benefits in pediatric patients. Our pilot program experience supports the feasibility and safety of pediatric robotic surgery. We emphasize the importance of a stepwise progression in operative difficulty and collaboration with adult robotic surgery experts.