Aim: Sacituzumab-govitecan (Sgov) is a new antibody-drug conjugate recently approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), so there are still few data published in the real-world setting.Materials & methods: This study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of Sgov in mTNBC of patients from the three main hospitals of a city and to compare with the pivotal ASCENT-trial. A total of 46 patients were included, all women diagnosed with mTNBC, with a median age of 52 years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 71.8% of patients.Results: Sgov effectiveness data seem to be slightly inferior than expected. Furthermore, it is observed that patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group of two or higher benefit significantly less from treatment with the drug. Safety profile of Sgov is acceptable.
Keywords: effectiveness; metastatic triple negative breast cancer; real world data; sacituzumab-govitecan; safety.
What is this article about? Sacituzumab-govitecan (Sgov) is a new drug recently approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer, so there is still little data on patients receiving treatment outside of a clinical trial.What were the results? At the cut-off date, 33 patients (71.7%) had withdrawn from treatment with Sgov, and 21 patients (45.7%) had died. Disease remained stable or shrank in 23.9% of patients (n = 11). Median time to disease progression was 4.1 months (IC 95%: 2.6–5.6) and median overall survival 11.0 months (95% CI: 6.1–15.9), with a median duration of follow-up of 6.6 months (interquartile range: 2.1–10.5). Patients with ECOG 0–1 (better performance status) show a higher overall survival than patients with higher ECOG (Not reached [95% CI: NR-NR] vs 3.8 [95% CI: 2.7–4.9]; p = 0.009). No patients stopped treatment due to side effects and almost two thirds of patients did not have to have their dose reduced or delayed due to adverse events (AE). Asthenia (71.7%) and anemia (60.9%) were the most frequent AE. No patient characteristics were identified that predicted less or worse toxicity.What do the results of the study mean? This suggests that sacituzumab-govitecan effectiveness data seem to be slightly worse than expected, even more when performance status before starting Sgov is poor (ECOG 2). AE profile of Sgov is acceptable.