Mandibular overdentures retained by 1 or 2 implants: a 5-year randomized clinical trial on implant stability and peri-implant outcomes

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 16;28(10):527. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05914-w.

Abstract

Aim: This is a report of the 5-year results of a two-group parallel randomized clinical trial comparing longitudinal implant stability, and clinical and radiographic peri-implant outcomes of mandibular overdentures retained by one (1-IOD group) or two (2-IOD group) implants.

Methods: All participants received 4.1 mm diameter tissue-level implants (Straumann® Standard Plus - SLActive®, Institut Straumann AG), installed in the mandible midline (1-IOD; n = 23) or the lateral incisor-canine area bilaterally (2-IOD; n = 24), and loaded after 3 weeks. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured using a resonance frequency device (Osstell® Mentor, Integration Diagnostics) at implant placement, after three weeks (loading), and at the 6-month, 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-ups. Marginal bone loss and clinical implant outcomes (plaque, calculus, suppuration and bleeding) were assessed periodically up to 5 years after loading.

Results: Only minor changes in marginal bone level were observed after 5 years (mean = 0.37; SD = 0.44 mm), and satisfactory and stable peri-implant parameters were observed throughout the 5-year follow-up. No significant differences between groups were found. Overall, the mean primary implant stability was considered high (> 70) for the two groups (1-IOD = 78.1 ± 4.5; 2-IOD = 78.0 ± 5.8). No noticeable changes were observed between implant insertion and loading. A marked increase was observed from insertion to the 6-month follow-up - the mean difference for the 1-IOD group was + 5.5 ± 5.5 (Effect size = 1.00), while for the 2-IOD group, the mean difference was + 6.0 ± 5.6 (Effect size = 1.08). No relevant changes were observed throughout the follow-up periods up to 5 years. Linear mixed-effect model regression showed no influence of the bone-related variables (p > 0.05) and the number of implants (p = 0.087), and a significant effect of the time variable (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Satisfactory peri-implant outcomes and stable secondary stability suggest good clinical performance and successful long-term osseointegration of the implants for single and two-implant mandibular overdentures. Using a single implant to retain a mandibular overdenture does not seem to result in detrimental implant loading over the five years of overdenture use.

Clinical relevance: This study corroborates the use of a single implant to retain a mandibular denture.

Keywords: Dental implant; Early dental implant loading; Edentulous mouth; Implant stability quotient; Overdenture; Randomized clinical; Trials.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Alveolar Bone Loss / diagnostic imaging
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / methods
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported*
  • Denture Retention*
  • Denture, Complete, Lower
  • Denture, Overlay*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mandible* / surgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Resonance Frequency Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome