Choosing the right treatment - combining clinicians' expert knowledge with data-driven predictions

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 3:15:1422587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1422587. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Context: This study proposes a Bayesian network model to aid mental health specialists making data-driven decisions on suitable treatments. The aim is to create a probabilistic machine learning model to assist psychologists in selecting the most suitable treatment for individuals for four potential mental disorders: Depression, Panic Disorder, Social Phobia, or Specific Phobia.

Methods: This study utilized a dataset from 1,094 individuals in Denmark containing socio-demographic details and mental health information. A Bayesian network was initially employed in a purely data-driven approach and was later refined with expert knowledge, referred to as a hybrid model. The model outputted probabilities for each disorder, with the highest probability indicating the most suitable disorder for treatment.

Results: By incorporating expert knowledge, the model demonstrated enhanced performance compared to a strictly data-driven approach. Specifically, it achieved an AUC score of 0.85 vs 0.80 on the test data. Furthermore, we evaluated some cases where the predictions of the model did not match the actual treatment. The symptom questionnaires indicated that these participants likely had comorbid disorders, with the actual treatment being proposed by the model with the second highest probability.

Conclusions: In 90.1% of cases, the hybrid model ranked the actual disorder treated as either the highest (67.3%) or second-highest (22.8%) on the test data. This emphasizes that instead of suggesting a single disorder to be treated, the model can offer the probabilities for multiple disorders. This allows individuals seeking treatment or their therapists to incorporate this information as an additional data-driven factor when collectively deciding on which treatment to prioritize.

Keywords: Bayesian network; clinician; digital psychiatry; machine learning; mental disorders.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This publication has emanated from research supported in part by a grant from Science Foundation Ireland under Grant number 18/CRT/6049 (EM). Additionally, the publication was funded by the fund to support clinical doctoral candidates in the Region of Southern Denmark under Grant number 21/58106, the Psychiatric Research Fund in Southern Denmark under Grant number A4180, and Jascha Foundation under Grant number 2021-0069 (EJ).