Background: The care of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with bone sarcomas involves unique challenges. The objectives of this study were to identify challenges and evaluate long-term outcomes of these patients from India who received treatment with novel protocols.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included AYA patients (aged 15-39 years) with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma (ES), who were treated uniformly at the authors' institute using unique protocols (OGS-12 and EFT-2001) from 2011 to 2021 and from 2013 to 2018, respectively.
Results: The cohorts included 688 of 748 (91.9%) treatment-naive AYA patients with osteosarcoma and 126 of 142 (88.7%) treatment-naive AYA patients with ES. Among 481 of 561 patients (85.7%) who had nonmetastatic osteosarcoma treated according to protocol, at a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the 5-year event-free survival (5-EFS) rate was 58.6% (95% confidence interval, 54.1%-63.5%) and for 142 patients (20.6%) who had metastatic osteosarcoma, the 5-EFS rate was 18.7%. The 5-EFS rate was 66.4% and 21.9% for 104 patients (73%) with nonmetastatic ES and 38 patients (27%) with metastatic ES, respectively. Treatment-naive patients had better outcomes, similar to compliance in the form of protocol completion (hazard ratio, 1.93 [p = .0043] and 2.66 [p < .0001], respectively. Only 230 of 377 (61.0%) male patients and 10 of 134 (7.4%) female patients reached out to fertility specialists. In addition, 17 of 161 (10.6%) eligible male survivors and 14 of 61 (22.9%) eligible female survivors got married posttreatment. Furthermore, 14 of 17 (82.4%) males and 14 of 14 (100%) females conceived. Among 311 patients who were working or attending school during diagnosis, greater than 90% had interruptions.
Conclusions: Homogenous treatment with the OGS-12 and EFT-2001 protocols resulted in internationally comparable long-term outcomes in the cohorts with nonmetastatic and metastatic AYA bone sarcomas. Treatment compliance, timely referral to sarcoma reference centers (avoiding prior inadvertent treatment), and streamlining fertility-preservation practices constitute unmet needs that demand prioritization.
Keywords: EFT‐2001 protocol; Ewing sarcoma; adolescents and young adults; chemotherapy; low‐income and middle‐income countries (LMICs); novel OGS‐12 protocol; osteosarcoma.
© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.