Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Allogeneic Stem Cell transplantation-A Comprehensive Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Background: Prophylactic antibiotics are still controversial during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In our transplant center, we suspended antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT in 2017.

Objective: The main objective of this study was the detailed analysis of the potentially beneficial impact of omittance of standard antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT in survival and Graft-versus-Host disease (GvHD) development, especially with consideration of confounding factors and competing events. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of the risk of severe infections and transplant-related mortality without antibiotic prophylaxis, the detailed assessment of bacterial and viral infections including multiresistant pathogens as well as occurrence of relapse in both groups. This study aims to support the development of future antibiotic strategies in allo-HSCT.

Study design: We retrospectively analyzed patient outcome in the time periods before (between December 2012 and February 2017) and after suspension (between March 2017 and June 2020) of antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT. Relevant clinical outcome parameters of the patients (n = 221) were collected by chart-review in the two groups (with antibiotic prophylaxis n = 101 versus without antibiotic prophylaxis n = 120). All patients were 18 years or older. Propensity score methods were used to adjust for potentially confounding patient characteristics. To address competing events, transitions between moderate/severe acute and chronic GvHD, relapse and death were analyzed using an inverse-propensity score weighted multistate modeling approach.

Results: While we observed a trend towards an improved outcome in the cohort without antibiotic prophylaxis, the inverse-propensity-score-weighted analyses did not show significant differences between the two groups in overall survival (OS) (P = .811) or development of acute GvHD (aGvHD) grade 3/4 (P = .158) and chronic moderate/severe GvHD (cGvHD) (P = .686). Multistate analysis respecting competing events revealed comparable estimated probabilities without antibiotic prophylaxis versus with antibiotic prophylaxis in OS (35.0% [95% CI: 28.2%-42.7%] versus 35.3% [95% CI: 27.8%-41.1%]) as well as development of aGvHD grade 3/4 (7.7% [95% CI: 5.9%-12.2%] vs. 10.6% [95% CI: 7.7%-15.7%]) and moderate/severe cGvHD (21.0% [95% CI: 17.7%-30.0%] vs. 23.8% [95% CI: 19.6%-31.4%]). Similar analyses showed also no significant differences in relapse rate, transplant-related mortality, relapse-related mortality, or GvHD-free/relapse-free survival between the two groups. An observed increase in severe infections without antibiotic prophylaxis did not lead to a significantly higher mortality rate. Viral reactivation and detection of multiresistant bacteria were comparable, yet a higher incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections was observed in patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis.

Conclusion: Our study supports previous reports of noninferiority of allo-HSCT without use of antibiotic prophylaxis with close monitoring and rapid intervention, if infection is suspected. The trend towards improved outcomes without antibiotic prophylaxis, however, might not only be due to the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis but also due to additional progresses in the field over the recent years. While the present study is too small to draw definite conclusions, these results strongly warrant further multicenter studies addressing the potential benefit of omitting antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT.