The Diagnostic Accuracy and Cutoff Value of Phase Angle for Screening Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Nov;25(11):105283. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105283. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

Abstract

Objectives: Phase angle (PhA) declines with age and is a reliable marker for muscle function, making it a potential screening indicator for sarcopenia. However, studies examined the reliability and validity of PhA for detecting sarcopenia, yielding inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and cutoff value of PhA for screening sarcopenia and examine the potential confounding factors.

Design: This is a meta-analysis.

Setting and participants: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to September 18, 2023. Eighteen studies (6184 participants) were included reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PhA for screening sarcopenia.

Methods: Pooled accuracy [ie, the computed area under the curve value (AUC)] and cutoff value interval for screening sarcopenia were estimated using a random-effects model. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity.

Results: The AUC value was 0.81. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 70%. The calculated 95% CI of the cutoff value of PhA for screening sarcopenia falls between 4.54° and 5.25°. The results of meta-regression analyses showed that ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), health status, and diagnostic criteria were the main factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy for screening sarcopenia (with all P values < 0.01).

Conclusion and implications: PhA may serve as a robust screening tool for sarcopenia, and the recommended cutoff interval falls between 4.54° and 5.25°. Ethnicity, BMI, health status, and diagnostic criteria can affect PhA's efficacy in sarcopenia screening.

Keywords: Sarcopenia; cutoff value; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; phase angle.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sarcopenia* / diagnosis
  • Sensitivity and Specificity