A Comparison of Postprocedural Hemoglobin in Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Large-Bore Aspiration Thrombectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Jamil M Ahmed; Christopher J Grilli; Daniel A Leung; Assaf Graif

doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.005

A Comparison of Postprocedural Hemoglobin in Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Large-Bore Aspiration Thrombectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Oct 12:S1051-0443(24)00627-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.005. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Jamil M Ahmed¹, Christopher J Grilli¹, Daniel A Leung¹, Assaf Graif²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.
² Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 39401746
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.005

Abstract

Purpose: To compare changes in hemoglobin (HB) following catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDL) versus large-bore aspiration thrombectomy (LBAT) of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective review of patients with acute high- or intermediate-risk PE treated with CDL or LBAT between December 2009 and September 2023 was performed. The LBAT group was divided according to usage of an autotransfusion device (ATD). There were 166 patients in the CDL group (56 years ± 15). LBAT patients were treated without (LBAT, n = 58, 61 years ± 16) or with (LBATw, n = 47, 62 years ± 15) an ATD. Endpoints included change in HB between preprocedural and postprocedural measurements, the 7-day postprocedural nadir (low point), and adverse events (AEs).

Results: The mean HB changes between preprocedural and postprocedural measurements in the CDL, LBAT, and LBATw groups were -1.3 g/dL ± 1.3, -1.6 g/dL ± 0.98, and -1.1 g/dL ± 0.9, respectively (P = .098). The mean HB changes to the 7-day postprocedural nadir in the CDL, LBAT, and LBATw groups were -1.7 g/dL (SD ± 1.4), -2.4 g/dL (SD ± 1.3), and -1.8 g/dL (SD ± 1.3), respectively (P = .008). The minor hemorrhagic AE rates were 3.6% in the CDL group, 12.1% in the LBAT group, and 14.9% in the LBATw group (P = .010). There was no significant difference in moderate (P = .079) and major (P = .529) hemorrhagic AEs between the groups. There were no procedure-related mortalities.

Conclusions: The use of LBAT without ATD resulted in a significant decrease in HB to the 7-day postprocedural nadir compared with CDL or LBAT with ATD. This did not translate into significantly higher transfusion rates or moderate or major hemorrhagic events. Findings suggest that the decision between CDL and LBAT should not be based solely on the expected blood loss consideration.