Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic ramosetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0309592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309592. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic use of ramosetron compared to no antiemetic medications for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) from the healthcare payer and societal perspectives in South Korea.

Method: A decision analytic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic ramosetron use versus no antiemetic therapy at 24-hour and 48-hour periods post-surgery over a 5-day duration. The model was populated using costs and utility parameters from published studies as well as from surveys of an expert panel of physicians using structured questionnaires. The cost parameters included the costs of drugs, treatment, patient time, productivity loss, and transportation. Effectiveness was measured using quality adjusted life years (QALYs). The study outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The parameter uncertainties were addressed using deterministic and probabilistic scenario analyses.

Results: The base-case analysis showed that, on average, patients treated with prophylactic ramosetron had lower costs from both the healthcare payer (US$16.88 vs US$17.33) and societal (US$16.89 vs US$18.72) perspectives and higher QALYs (0.0121 vs 0.0114) over the 5-day study duration compared to patients without any antiemetic medications. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of results for the parameters included in the model. The acceptability curve probability showed that treating patients with ramosetron compared to no antiemetic medications was more than 99% cost-effective at a willingness-to pay threshold of US$5,000/QALY from both payer and societal perspectives.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that prophylactic use of ramosetron compared to no antiemetic therapy is highly cost-effective to prevent PONV for patients undergoing surgery from both healthcare payer and societal perspectives. The cost effectiveness is the result of the decrease in the incidence of PONV and the direct treatment costs of severe PONV with improved patient quality of life.

MeSH terms

  • Antiemetics* / economics
  • Antiemetics* / therapeutic use
  • Benzimidazoles* / economics
  • Benzimidazoles* / therapeutic use
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting* / drug therapy
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting* / economics
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting* / prevention & control
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*
  • Republic of Korea

Substances

  • ramosetron
  • Benzimidazoles
  • Antiemetics

Grants and funding

This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education [grant numbers 2021R1A6A1A03044296]. This study was also partially funded by an unrestricted research grant from Daiichi-Sankyo, South Korea. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.