Background: Corroborating evidence for use of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) suggests a beneficial effect in regards to biliary complications. Here, we aim to evaluate whether perfusion via portal vein alone (sHOPE) or via additional perfusion of the hepatic artery (dHOPE) have diverging impact on outcomes after OLT when compared to use of static cold storage (SCS).
Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing OLT at Medical University of Vienna (2018 to 2023) were retrospectively analyzed. Donor organs were procured using SCS, or subjected to end-ischemic sHOPE or dHOPE. Severity of biliary complications was classified according to degree of therapeutic intervention (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or surgical revision).
Results: 247 patients were included (69 SCS, 76 sHOPE, 102 dHOPE). Hospitalization was shorter for patients after HOPE (median in days: SCS=25 vs HOPE=20, P=0.019). Biliary complications were less frequent in patients after HOPE (SCS=37.7% vs HOPE=22.5%, P=0.015). A significantly lower incidence of surgical revisions for biliary complications was observed in the HOPE cohort (24.6% vs 11.8%, P=0.012). When evaluating outcome according to HOPE-modality, a significant reduction in biliary complications (P=0.006) and surgical revisions (P=0.002) was only observed in dHOPE patients in comparison to SCS. Further, only dHOPE was significantly associated with reduced need for surgical revision for biliary complications upon uni- and multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio=0.336, P=0.011).
Conclusion: HOPE leads to a reduction of biliary complications and associated surgical revisions. This effect seems to be primarily associated with use of dHOPE, while both methods appear as feasible options for preconditioning of donor grafts prior to OLT.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.