Comparative Analyses of the Outcomes Between Lobectomies and Trisegmentectomies/Lingulectomies in the Surgical Management of Clinical Stage I Left Upper Lobe Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Lobectomies are the standard surgical intervention for lung cancer; however, recently, surgeons have considered segmentectomies for smaller tumors, with their potential for favorable survival outcomes while preserving lung function. The surgical outcomes of trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies and lobectomies for clinical stage I left upper lobe (LUL) non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) remain undetermined. Thus, our study aimed to assess the differences between the short-term surgical and long-term survival outcomes in patients with clinical stage I LUL NSCLC who underwent trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies and those who underwent lobectomies.

Methods: Between 2011 and 2021, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 377 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who had undergone LUL lobectomies or trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies. Patients were categorized into two subcohorts according to tumor size, i.e. 0-2 and 2-4 cm. To ensure preoperative demographic comparability, 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed.

Results: This study focused on the 2-4 cm subcohort. Post-PSM, patients who underwent trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies had quicker operations and shorter postoperative hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay than those who underwent lobectomies. Post-PSM, no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups in both the 0-2 and 2-4 cm subcohorts. The multivariate analysis revealed that different surgical methods were not statistically significant factors for either PFS or OS.

Conclusions: Trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies are a feasible option for clinical stage I NSCLC, with better perioperative outcomes and similar survival rates when compared with LUL lobectomies.