Purpose: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes between posterior drainage of residual fluid using a 41G cannula, fluid tolerance (R-SRF), and conventional complete drainage methods, including removal through peripheral retinal breaks (PRB), perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL), and posterior retinotomy (PR).
Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we evaluated cases for visual acuity (VA) at 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included surgical success, postoperative metamorphopsia, shifts, full-thickness folds (FTF), optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters, and safety. Subgroup analyses were also conducted.
Results: VA did not differ significantly between the three main groups. Subgroup analyses revealed worse VA for PR with 1.131 LogMAR (20/270 in Snellen conversion, p=0,002), with significantly more grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR, 40.0%, p=0,003). R-SRF tended to offer better secondary outcomes, without statistical significance except for postoperative epiretinal membrane (ERM, 30.8%, p=0,041). Subgroup analyses found significantly more shifts with PFCL (91,7%, p=0,036). No cases of postoperative FTF or macular holes were observed with the 41G.
Conclusion: Our study introduced the 41G technique, indicating favourable outcomes for fovea-off retinal detachments. Nevertheless, fluid tolerance appeared to be the best option, offering a cost-effective and faster method, with an optimal microstructural profile and VA comparable to that of complete drainage techniques.