Subcutaneous tunnelling versus conventional insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients (TUNNEL-PICC): a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, controlled trial

J Hosp Infect. 2025 Jan:155:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Oct 26.

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate whether subcutaneous tunnelling in peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement could reduce the occurrence of central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).

Methods: We conducted an open-label, multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial in five tertiary hospitals. Adult hospitalized patients requiring a PICC were randomized in a one-to-one ratio to conventional (cPICC) or tunnelled PICC (tPICC) arms using a centralized web-based computer-generated stratified randomization. CLABSI rates between groups were compared in a modified intention-to-treat population. Safety including the incidence of exit-site infection or haemorrhage-associated catheter removal were also compared. This trial was registered with Clinical Research Information Service of Republic of Korea (KCT0005521).

Findings: From November 2020 to March 2023, 1324 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to tPICC (N = 662) and cPICC (N = 662). This study was terminated early due to the cohort CLABSI rate being lower than estimated, therefore, the original sample size of 1694 would render the study underpowered to detect a difference in CLABSI rates. In the tPICC, CLABSI occurred in 13 of 651 participants over 11,071 catheter-days (1.2/1000 catheter-days), compared with 20 among 650 patients with cPICC over 11,141 catheter-days (1.8/1000 catheter-days, rate ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.30-1.38, P=0.30). The incidence of exit-site infection (29 tPICC, 36 cPICC, P=0.5) and haemorrhage-associated catheter removal (11 tPICC, 11 cPICC, P=0.99) did not show a difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: Due to insufficient sample size, this study could not demonstrate a statistically significant CLABSI risk reduction in the tPICC group compared with the cPICC group. Both groups had similar rates of exit site infection and bleeding.

Keywords: Catheter-related bloodstream infections; Central venous catheterization; Central-line-associated bloodstream infections; Peripherally inserted central venous catheter.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Catheter-Related Infections* / epidemiology
  • Catheter-Related Infections* / prevention & control
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / instrumentation
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / methods
  • Catheterization, Peripheral* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Republic of Korea / epidemiology
  • Tertiary Care Centers