Background: Few previous studies evaluated the impact of time from the hospital arrival to the implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (door to ECPR time) on outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients.
Methods: 50 patients with OHCA who received both ECPR and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Cardiovascular Division, NHO Osaka National Hospital were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median of door to ECPR time. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Survival analyses were conducted to compare all-cause mortality at 90 days between 2 groups. Neurological outcome at 30 days was also compared between 2 groups using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC).
Results: The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that all-cause mortality at 90 days was significantly higher among patients with door to ECPR time ≥ 25 min compared with those with door to ECPR time < 25 min (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-8.18). The proportion of patients with CPC at 30 days ≤ 2 was significantly higher among patients with shorter door to ECPR time (P = 0.048).
Conclusion: Among patients with OHCA due to acute MI who received ECPR and PCI, the shorter door to ECPR time was associated with the lower mortality and favorable neurological outcomes.
Keywords: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Myocardial infarction; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2024 The Authors.