Impact of a newly implemented burn protocol at Tri-Service General Hospital: Outcome analysis of 20-year experience

Burns. 2024 Oct 17;51(1):107293. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107293. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Purpose: To share our 20-year experience in major burn management and the impact of a newly implemented burn protocol since 2015 at Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH).

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of severely burned patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at TSGH from January 2003 to September 2023. Data regarding demographics, complications, and mortality were collected and analyzed. We compared the patient data before (pre-implementation) and after 2015 (post-implementation), when the new major burn management protocol was introduced.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the mean total body surface area of the burns between the groups. The post-implementation group had younger age (34.62 vs 45.06, P < 0.001) and lower rate of inhalation injury (60.8 % vs 82.5 %, P = 0.005). No statistically significant difference was observed in the ICU stays between the groups. The post-implementation group had a statistically significant lower all-cause mortality (8.1 % vs 47.6 %, P < 0.0001) and lower rate of renal replacement therapy (RRT) (20.3 % vs 42.9 %, P = 0.004) but earlier initiation of RRT.

Conclusion: The new TSGH Burns Protocol revolutionized the care of major burns by introducing tailored, multidisciplinary burn management and improved patient outcomes.

Keywords: Early debridement; Goal-directed fluid resuscitation; Major burn; Renal replacement therapy; Silver-containing wound dressing.