Hybrid metagenomic assembly of microbial communities, leveraging both long- and short-read sequencing technologies, is becoming an increasingly accessible approach, yet its widespread application faces several challenges. High-quality references may not be available for assembly accuracy comparisons common for benchmarking, and certain aspects of hybrid assembly may benefit from dataset-dependent, empiric guidance rather than the application of a uniform approach. In this study, several simple, reference-free characteristics-particularly coding gene content and read recruitment profiles-were hypothesized to be reliable indicators of assembly quality improvement during iterative error-fixing processes. These characteristics were compared to reference-dependent genome- and gene-centric analyses common for microbial community metagenomic studies. Two laboratory-scale bioreactors were sequenced with short- and long-read platforms, and assembled with commonly used software packages. Following long read assembly, long read correction and short read polishing were iterated up to ten times to resolve errors. These iterative processes were shown to have a substantial effect on gene- and genome-centric community compositions. Simple, reference-free assembly characteristics, specifically changes in gene fragmentation and short read recruitment, were robustly correlated with advanced analyses common in published comparative studies, and therefore are suitable proxies for hybrid metagenome assembly quality to simplify the identification of the optimal number of correction and polishing iterations. As hybrid metagenomic sequencing approaches will likely remain relevant due to the low added cost of short-read sequencing for differential coverage binning or the ability to access lower abundance community members, it is imperative that users are equipped to estimate assembly quality prior to downstream analyses.
Keywords: Hybrid metagenomic assembly; Microbial community.
©2024 Smith et al.