Vertigo (or dizziness) is one of the most common symptoms in clinical practice. The misdiagnosis rate of vertigo diseases is high due to the factors that vertigo disorders involve multiple systems and organs throughout the body with a wide range of pathogenesis, and different kind of vertigo diseases often present with overlapping clinical presentation. In recent years, scholars have conducted many explorations in the diagnosis model of vertigo disorders, the identification model of high-risk central vertigo, or the combination of diagnostic tests such as the TiTrATE diagnostic model for vertigo disorders (Newman-Toker and Edlow, 2015), the ATTEST differential diagnosis model for acute vertigo (Gurley and Edlow, 2019); the application of the ABCD2 score to assess the risk of high-risk vertigo (Navi et al, 2012), and the "TriAGe+" score to assess the risk of stroke in vertigo patients (Kuroda et al, 2017); HINTS battery (Kattah et al, 2009), HINTS+ battery (Newman-Toker et al, 2013), and STANDING battery (Vanni et al, 2014) for acute serious vestibular disorders. These diagnostic approaches are immensely beneficial in enhancing the accuracy of vertigo diagnosis, as well as for identifying high-risk central vertigo with reducing the misdiagnosis of vertigo. Based on clinical experience, with referring to the diagnostic approaches mentioned above, the author propose the SCD programmatic diagnostic strategy for vertigo disorders[Strategy 1: Classification of vertigo syndromes (syndromes, S); Strategy 2: Identify/diagnose high-risk central vertigo (central, C); Strategy 3: differential diagnosis of peripheral vertigo (disease, D) ] and the A·E³GAP·AT differentiation battery and A²B²C²D²E³ alarm battery for dangerous central vertigo as well as targeted identifying and examining of E³GAP battery for central vertigo in five steps.The SCD programmatic diagnostic strategy for vertigo disorders is beneficial for clinicians to grasp diagnostic approach and pay special attention to dangerous central vertigo, while mastering the differential diagnosis model of dangerous central vertigo as well as the rapid diagnostic approach of peripheral vertigo.
摘要:眩晕(或头晕)是临床上最常见的症状之一。因眩晕疾病涉及全身多个系统和器官,病因广泛,且不同的眩晕疾病临床症状常有重叠,故眩晕疾病误诊率较高。近年来,学者们在眩晕疾病的诊断模式、高危中枢性眩晕的鉴别模式或诊断检查组合等方面进行了诸多探索。包括眩晕疾病TiTrATE诊断模式(Newman-Toker和Edlow,2015)、急性眩晕的ATTEST鉴别诊断模式(Gurley和Edlow,2019);应用ABCD²评分评估高危性眩晕的风险(Navi等,2012)、“TriAGe+”score评估眩晕患者脑卒中的风险(Kuroda等,2017);建立HINTS组合(Kattah等,2009)、HINTS+组合(Newman-Toker等,2013)、STANDING组合(Vanni等,2014)检查法诊断脑卒中。这些眩晕诊断路径或高危中枢性眩晕的检查组合对提高眩晕疾病诊断的准确性和高危中枢性眩晕的确诊率,以及对减少眩晕的误诊率具有极大的帮助。笔者在结合临床经验的基础上,参考近年来国外学者推荐的方法和临床研究报道,总结出眩晕疾病的SCD程序式诊断策略[策略一:眩晕综合征分类(syndromes,S);策略二:鉴别/诊断高危中枢性眩晕(central,C);策略三:鉴别诊断外周性眩晕(disease,D)];以及危险中枢性眩晕的A·E³GAP·AT鉴别模式和A²B²C²D²E³评分预警组合,靶向鉴别检查E³GAP组合五步骤。眩晕SCD程序式诊断策略利于临床医师建立诊断逻辑思维并重视危险中枢性眩晕,同时掌握危险中枢性眩晕的鉴别模式和外周性眩晕的快速诊断路径。.
Keywords: A²B²C²D²E³ alarm battery; E³GAP battery; SCD strategy; bedside examine; high risk vertigo; programming diagnosis; vestibular disorders.
Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.