[Research on the prognosis and efficacy criteria of sudden sensorineural hearing loss]

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Nov;38(11):1085-1090. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.11.018.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a common and frequently-occurring disease. Looking at the efficacy evaluation of the diagnosis and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss at home and abroad, each country has its own characteristics in the indicators and criteria of the treatment efficacy evaluation, and the common indicators of efficacy evaluation include: average pure-tone hearing threshold, the absolute value of hearing improvement of impaired frequency, the percentage of average pure-tone hearing threshold increase, speech discrimination score, speech recognition threshold, etc. The evaluation criteria mostly take the efficacy grade or the improvement level of average hearing threshold as the criterion of effective treatment, and the lack of unified standards is not conducive to the homogenization of global research related to sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In order to provide reference for the clinical evaluation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in China, this study systematically reviewed the clinical practice guidelines and the evaluation indexes and criteria of clinical efficacy in high quality clinical multicenter studies of the disease in many countries.

摘要: 突发性聋是一种常见病、多发病。纵览国内外突发性聋诊治的疗效评估,各国在治疗疗效评估指标和标准方面各具特色,常用疗效判定的指标包括:①平均听阈;②受损频率听力提高的绝对值;③平均听阈提升的百分比;④言语识别率;⑤言语识别阈等。评估标准多以疗效分级或平均听阈的改善水平作为治疗有效的判定标准,缺乏统一标准,不利于全球突发性聋相关研究的同质化推进。本文系统回顾了多国突发性聋临床实践指南及质量较高的临床多中心研究中的疗效评估指标和标准,以便为我国突发性聋诊治效果评价改进提供参考。.

Keywords: criteria; efficacy assessment; index; sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Audiometry, Pure-Tone
  • Auditory Threshold
  • China
  • Hearing Loss, Sensorineural* / diagnosis
  • Hearing Loss, Sudden* / diagnosis
  • Hearing Loss, Sudden* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Prognosis
  • Treatment Outcome