Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy is Self-Reported as a Minimally Effective, and Sometimes Harmful, Treatment for Pudendal Neuralgia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Int J Sex Health. 2024 Aug 28;36(4):627-635. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2397124. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is a sexual pain disorder characterized as pain of the genital and/or perineal regions, and despite the lack of clinical evidence supporting its use, pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a recommended treatment for PN.

Methods: An online anonymous cross-sectional survey was administered to participants through convenience sampling conducted on May 19 to September 19, 2023 to understand the self-reported efficacy of PFPT as a treatment for PN. Participants' measures included sociodemographics, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and satisfaction scores.

Results: The average self-reported PGIC score among participants was 4.6 ± 1.3 (n = 144), indicating no to minimal improvement in symptoms. Most participants (66%) scored 4 or 5, suggesting no change to minimal improvement. Twelve percent of participants scored 3 or lower, indicating worsening of symptoms, and only 22% scored 6 or 7, indicating much or very much improvement of symptoms. Participants who only participated in PFPT (n = 24) had a lower PGIC score of 4.4 ± 1.3. For self-reported satisfaction with PFPT as a treatment for PN, participants self-reported a score of 4.9 ± 3.0, indicating slight dissatisfaction. For those who experienced symptom improvement, the median number of sessions before noticing improvement was five sessions.

Conclusion: Based on self-reported results, PFPT is a minimally effective, and sometimes harmful, treatment for PN. Patients should receive greater transparency regarding the lack of efficacy of PFPT and its potential harm.

Keywords: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC); Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy; Pudendal Neuralgia; Sexual Pain.

Grants and funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.