Accuracy of self-reported height, weight, and waist circumference in poor, rural areas of China

PeerJ. 2024 Nov 15:12:e18525. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18525. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: There are differing opinions and findings about the accuracy of self-reported data. This study sought to assess the accuracy of self-reported height, weight, and waist circumference (WC) data among adult residents in poor, rural areas of China.

Methods: Multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling was used to sample rural adult residents in Jinzhai County. Intraclass correlations (ICCs), Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreements (LOAs), and Cohen's kappa were used to examine the accuracy of self-reported data. Multiple linear regression was used to explore the effect of demographic and socioeconomic variables.

Results: Height was over-reported by an average of 0.67 cm, weight and WC were both under-reported, by an average of 0.004 kg and 1.09 cm, respectively. The ICC for height was 0.92, the ICC for weight was 0.93, and the ICC for WC was 0.93. Bland-Altman plots showed no trend in variability with increasing height, weight, and WC, but 95% of the LOAs were wide, especially for WC. The percentage agreement (kappa) for BMI was 82.10% (0.71), and the percentage agreement for WC was 83.56% (0.66). Overall, obesity, overweight, and increased WC were underestimated by 0.56%, 2.64%, and 6.89%, respectively. Assessments of which demographic and socioeconomic factors were associated with statistically significant differences between self-reported and measured data showed that education (junior school vs. primary or below: β = -0.56, 95% CI [-1.01 to -0.11]) and occupation (others vs. professionals: β = 2.16, 95% CI [0.62-3.70]) were associated with differences between measured and self-reported height; occupation (industrial and commercial service vs. professionals: β = 1.57, 95% CI [0.52-2.61]) was associated with differences between measured and self-reported weight; and gender (women vs. men: β = -1.74, 95% CI [-2.51 to -0.97]) and age (60- vs. 18-44: β = -1.62, 95% CI [-2.88 to -0.36]) were associated with differences between measured and self-reported WC.

Conclusions: Self-reported height and weight were shown to be reliable in poor, rural areas of China, but self-reported WC should be used with caution. To improve the accuracy of self-reported data, certain subgroups should be targeted for educational interventions.

Keywords: Accuracy; BMI; China; Height; Poverty; Rural; Self-reported; Subgroup; Waist circumference; Weight.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Body Height*
  • Body Weight*
  • China / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity / epidemiology
  • Poverty / statistics & numerical data
  • Rural Population* / statistics & numerical data
  • Self Report*
  • Waist Circumference*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Peak Subject Project (Collaborative Education & Innovation Project) of School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University (2024GWXTYRZ003) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.