Interphase formation versus fluoride-ion insertion in tunnel-structured transition metal antimonites

Alice R Giem; Jaime R Ayala; Jingxiang Cheng; Conan Weiland; Cherno Jaye; Daniel A Fischer; Sarbajit Banerjee

doi:10.1039/d4cc04331f

Interphase formation versus fluoride-ion insertion in tunnel-structured transition metal antimonites

Chem Commun (Camb). 2024 Dec 5;60(98):14589-14592. doi: 10.1039/d4cc04331f.

Authors

Alice R Giem^{1

2}, Jaime R Ayala^{1

2}, Jingxiang Cheng^{1

2}, Conan Weiland³, Cherno Jaye³, Daniel A Fischer³, Sarbajit Banerjee^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. [email protected].
² Department of Material Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
³ Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.

PMID: 39569674
DOI: 10.1039/d4cc04331f

Abstract

Fluoridating reagents are used to model interfacial reactions in fluoride-ion batteries. Topochemical F-ion insertion is seen for one-dimensional (1D) tunnel-structured FeSb₂O₄ but interphase formation comprising antimony (oxy)fluorides is observed for MnSb₂O₄.