What works when working together?: Cross-sector collaboration barriers & facilitators of a built environment Health Impact Assessment in Southern Nevada

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2427885. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2427885. Epub 2024 Nov 24.

Abstract

Purpose: Cross-sector collaboration can improve community health because decisions made across sectors influence health. Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) and other health-focused, cross-sector collaborations encounter challenges. This case study uses a completed HIA to explore factors impeding and supporting health-related cross-sectoral collaboration.

Methods: Semi-structured key informant interviews with 10 of 12 HIA working group participants were conducted and analysed using a content analysis approach.

Results: Analysis generated 48 codes across seven themes in three primary groups: HIA as a collaborative tool; logistical and systemic barriers; and benefits and logistical, interpersonal, and sectoral facilitators. Recognizing the importance of knowledge, analysis, and principles outside of one's field (n = 62) was the most common facilitator. Limited time was the most common barrier (n = 21). Participants discussed more facilitators (n = 303) than barriers (n = 144); perceived multiple benefits (n = 92), including networking and connecting land use and health; and described facilitators like communication, continuity, engagement, project management, compensation, varying perspectives, and diverse skills. They identified coordination challenges, needs to engage more with stakeholders and the community, limited time, and changes among partners as primary barriers.

Conclusions: Findings can help prepare cross-sector partners about what to expect, aid in mitigating challenges, and further knowledge about what supports and hinders Health in All Policies collaborations.

Keywords: Health in all policies; cross-sector collaboration; health impact assessment; partnerships; social determinants of health.

MeSH terms

  • Built Environment*
  • Communication
  • Cooperative Behavior*
  • Female
  • Health Impact Assessment*
  • Humans
  • Intersectoral Collaboration
  • Male
  • Nevada
  • Public Health
  • Qualitative Research
  • Stakeholder Participation

Grants and funding

Part of the work for this project was supported by grant #NU58DP6578, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and awarded to the Southern Nevada Health District. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services. Part of the work for this project was also supported by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. The publication fees for this article were supported in part by the UNLV University Libraries Open Article Fund.