Assessing the Genetic Causal Effects Between Blood Metabolites and Spinal Pain: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 20:17:3897-3918. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S487156. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Previous metabolomics studies have indicated a close association between blood metabolites and pain. However, the causal relationship between blood metabolites and spinal pain (SP) remains unclear. This study employs a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal relationship between 452 blood metabolites and SP.

Methods: We used bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to assess the causal relationship between blood metabolites and SP, including neck pain (NP), thoracic spine pain (TSP), low back pain (LBP), and back pain (BP). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data for 452 metabolites (7,824 participants) were used as exposure variables. Summary data for NP were obtained from the UK Biobank, for TSP from the FinnGen Biobank, and for LBP from both the UK Biobank and the FinnGen Biobank. Summary data for BP were obtained from the UK Biobank. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was used to estimate the causal relationships between metabolites and SP, complemented by various sensitivity analyses to account for pleiotropy and heterogeneity, ensuring robust results.

Results: The IVW analysis identified 155 metabolites associated with SP risk and 142 metabolites influenced by SP. No significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was observed through other analytical methods.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates potential causal effects between blood metabolites and SP, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of SP. These findings lay a theoretical foundation for preventing and treating SP through targeted interventions on specific blood metabolites, potentially elucidating underlying biological mechanisms.

Keywords: Mendelian randomization; back pain; blood metabolites; causality; low back pain; neck pain; spinal pain; thoracic spine pain.

Grants and funding

The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang (No. 2022C03123), the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81774442 and 82274672), the National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Fund Project (82305426), Key Discipline Project of High level TCM of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (GJXK2023-85), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project (LQ23H270010), the Scientific research project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (Y202351266), and the School-Level Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University (2021RCZXZK03, 2022FSYYZQ13, and 2022GJYY045).