Aortic Dimension in Elite Athletes: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Nov 26:zwae385. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae385. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the presence and the extent of an "aortic remodeling" in elite athletes.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature were conducted for studies (1981-2024) reporting echocardiographic aortic diameters of elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls. Among the 5,494 studies retrieved, 21 (9,464 elite athletes vs. 2,637 non-athlete controls) fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Data were aggregated using a random effects model for estimating the pooled risk ratio and mean difference.

Results: Absolute aortic diameters at the sinus of Valsalva (AoSV) were higher in overall elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls (mean difference [MD] 1.69 [95% CI 1.01-2.37] mm; p <0.001) and if stratified to sex. This difference was maintained if AoSV was indexed to height (AoSV/h) (MD 0.04 [95% CI -0.00-0.08] mm/m; ES 2.18 [95% CI 1.10-3.26]; p<0.001). The analysis of AoSV/h according to sex was not performed for the paucity of studies. However, when indexed to body surface area (AoSV/BSA), no differences were found between the two groups (MD 0.04 [95% CI -0.25-0.34] mm/m2; p = 0.880), also according to sex. Above findings were not influenced by age.

Conclusions: Absolute AoSV was mildly larger in athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls, even when indexed to height. However, no differences were evident when indexed by BSA, irrespective of sex, type of sport and age. Therefore, assessment of the aortic size in elite athletes should consider the proper normalization in order to avoid misdiagnosis of aortopathies.

Prospero registry id: CRD42024561255.

Keywords: aorta; aortic diameter; aortic remodeling; elite athletes; sport.

Plain language summary

Aortic diameters evaluation in athletes represents an important topic in cardiology and the knowledge about the aortic remodeling driven by intense exercise would allow for the correct management of athletes by differentiating those with pathologic enlargement from those with physiologic adaptation. This comprehensive meta-analysis highlights mildly larger absolute AoSV diameters in elite athletes compared to non-athlete healthy controls, even when indexed to height. However, no differences were evident when indexed by BSA, irrespective of sex, type of sport and age.Assessment of the aortic size in elite athletes should consider the proper normalization in order to avoid misdiagnosis of aortopathies.