To Identify and Compare ActivPAL Objectively Measured Activity Levels With Self-Reported Activity From the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Older Adults With Intellectual Disability

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e13327. doi: 10.1111/jar.13327.

Abstract

Background: The positive impact of physical activity on health is widely known. A comparison between activPAL objective measures and International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF) self-reported activity levels was completed with older adults with intellectual disability. Understanding differences between the two methodologies will better support the interpretations of findings and recommendations.

Methods: ActivPAL measures including intensity, time and type were considered for 72 participants. Similarly, the IPAQ-determined measures were investigated. Implications of different numbers of activPAL valid days were considered. Comparisons between the activPAL and IPAQ-SF scores were examined using multiple correlation coefficients.

Results: Low to moderate agreement was found between the activPAL and IPAQ-SF using Spearman's Rho and Pearson's correlation coefficients.

Conclusions: The IPAQ-SF may not be the optimal tool for the accurate determination of activity levels in this population.

Keywords: inactivity; intellectual disability; objective measures; self‐report.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Accelerometry
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Exercise*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intellectual Disability*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Self Report*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards