Benefits of promoting scholarship among program directors: promoting scholarship among directors is a win-win-win for institutions, trainees, and directors

Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Nov 20:9:1477471. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1477471. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

When the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget doubled in the late 1990s, it led to a rise in the number of PhD-trained scientists and to increased NIH-funded programs to diversify the biomedical workforce. This trend has seen more PhD scientists take on leadership roles as program directors in academia. These program directors are often highly skilled in research design and data analysis, and they bring a scholarly approach to their administrative duties. Despite organizational challenges, promoting scholarship among program directors offers numerous benefits, including enhanced institutional reputation and better training outcomes. Herein we use examples from peer reviewed literature to illustrate how publications by program directors have influenced national policies and practices in biomedical training. Encouraging more academic institutions to support program director scholarship can yield significant returns for institutions, trainees, and the directors themselves.

Keywords: higher education; life science training; program directors; program evaluation; scholarship.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Office of Graduate Education, University of North Carolina School of Medicine. PB's effort was supported in part by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences SCISIPBIO Award (R01GM140282). The funders had no role in decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.