Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement-related infective endocarditis (TAVR-IE) is associated with a poor prognosis. TAVR-IE diagnosis is challenging, and benefits of the most recent classifications (ESC-2015, ISCVID-2023 and ESC-2023) have not been compared with the conventional Duke criteria on this population.
Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the diagnostic value of the Duke, ESC-2015, ISCVID-2023, and ESC-2023 criteria for the diagnosis of TAVR-IE.The secondary objectives were to determine which criteria increase the diagnostic accuracy of each classification and to evaluate in-hospital and 1-year mortality of TAVR-IE.
Methods: From January 2015 to May 2022, 92 patients with suspected TAVR-IE were retrospectively included in 2 French centers, including 82 patients with definite TAVR-IE and 10 patients with rejected TAVR-IE as defined by expert consensus.
Results: Duke classification yielded a sensitivity of 65% (95%, CI: 53%-75%) and a specificity of 100% (95%, CI: 69%-100%) for the diagnosis of TAVR-IE. ESC-2015 classification increased Duke criteria sensitivity from 65% to 73% (p=0.016) but decreased specificity from 100% to 90%. ISCVID-2023 and ESC-2023 also increased Duke criteria sensitivity, from 65% to 76% (p=0.004) and 77% (p=0.002), respectively but also decreased specificity from 100% to 90%. A positive 18F-FDG PET/CT was the most helpful criterion, as 10 patients (11%) were correctly reclassified. In-hospital mortality after TAVR-IE was 21% and one-year mortality was 38%.
Conclusions: A multimodality imaging approach, including 18F-FDG PET/CT and gated cardiac CT, is the cornerstone of TAVR-IE diagnosis and explains the higher sensitivity of ESC-2015 and recent classifications compared with Duke criteria.
Keywords: 18F-FDG PET/CT; Gated cardiac CT; Infective endocarditis; Multimodality imaging; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].