Peer review is an essential cornerstone of scientific advancement. This process involves understanding study design, data analytics, and interpretation of the evidence. For clinicians who are performing their initial peer reviews, and even for seasoned reviewers who assess complex manuscripts, it can be helpful to have a standard approach. We therefore provide a conceptual framework for peer review which builds upon experiences that are already familiar to trainees and practicing clinicians, by drawing parallels between patient encounters and peer review. This framework has been used in successive years as a didactic tool for our trainees who are being mentored toward excellence in peer review.
Keywords: clinical frameworks; clinician training; evidence interpretation; peer review.
© 2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.